Saez v. Bounther
Petitioner: Juan Saez
Respondent: Mr. Bounther and Amy Boncher
Case Number: 4:2023cv40061
Filed: May 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: David H Hennessy
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2023 Filing 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel by Juan Saez. (Barrows, Jennifer) Modified docket text on 7/14/2023 (Burgos, Sandra).
July 7, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian N. Canzoneri on behalf of Amy Boncher (Canzoneri, Julian)
June 29, 2023 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2241 Petition. The Respondent shall file an answer or other responsive pleading within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. Because the name of Warden of FMC Devens is misspelled on the petition as Mr. Bounther, the Clerk shall correct the docket to identify the Respondent as Amy Boncher, Warden. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 439 (2004) (immediate custodian of petitioner is proper respondent in habeas action). (Attachments: #1 consent forms)(PSSA, 4)
June 28, 2023 Filing 4 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 100003799 for #1 Complaint (Barbosa, Nilsa)
May 19, 2023 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered. Procedural Order regarding resolution of filing fee. Plaintiff must respond within 21 days. (PSSA, 5)
May 18, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Barrows, Jennifer)
May 18, 2023 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 USC 2241 filed by Juan Saez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Barrows, Jennifer) Modified docket text on 6/28/2023 (Burgos, Sandra).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saez v. Bounther
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Saez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mr. Bounther
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Amy Boncher
Represented By: Julian N. Canzoneri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?