Porter Jr. v. Malden District Court et al
| Richard W. Porter Jr. |
| Malden District Court, Wakefield Police Dept., Worcester Recovery Center + Hospital and Nancy Moreno |
| 4:2023cv40086 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASEAssociated Cases: 4:23-cv-40086-TSH, 4:23-cv-40114-TSH(PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 3 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. 1. Porter's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, and he is allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in both cases. 2. These actions are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. All pending motions shall be terminated as moot.Associated Cases: 4:23-cv-40086-TSH, 4:23-cv-40114-TSH(PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Barrows, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Richard W. Porter Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(Barrows, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
