Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Evelyn Johnson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 4:2023cv40094
Filed: August 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Margaret R Guzman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2023 Filing 9 Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet by Evelyn Johnson. (Paladino, Joseph)
August 10, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy C. Bland on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Bland, Amy)
August 9, 2023 Filing 7 District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Castles, Martin)
August 8, 2023 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Local Category Form. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents- Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet. (Barrows, Jennifer)
August 8, 2023 Filing 5 District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: ORDER entered. Procedural Order re Social Security ActionThe court transmits this action to the Commissioner of the appropriate office within the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel and to the United States Attorney for this district, through this NEF, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 3. (Barrows, Jennifer)
August 8, 2023 Filing 4 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Barrows, Jennifer)
August 8, 2023 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Margaret R. Guzman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Barrows, Jennifer)
August 8, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Evelyn Johnson. (Barrows, Jennifer)
August 8, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Evelyn Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Notice of Decision-UNFAVORABLE, #2 Exhibit B-NOTICE OF APPEALS COUNCIL ACTION, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, # 7 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS) (Paladino, Joseph) Modified text on 8/8/2023 (Barrows, Jennifer).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evelyn Johnson
Represented By: Joseph M. Paladino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Office of the Gen
Represented By: Amy C. Bland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?