Laura v. Lazowski
Plaintiff: Quantreil Laura
Defendant: Matthew Lazowski
Case Number: 4:2023cv40111
Filed: September 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: David H Hennessy
Referring Judge: Timothy S Hillman
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2023 Filing 10 Copy re 9 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, mailed to Quantriel Laura on 10/24/2023. (Burgos, Sandra)
October 24, 2023 Filing 9 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time "Plaintiff's Notice, ECF No. 7, is construed as a motion for extension of time, and allowed only to the extent that the plaintiff shall file any supplement to his response to the Court's October 4, 2023 show cause order (ECF No. 6) by November 10, 2023." (PSSA, 5)
October 23, 2023 Filing 8 Federal Question Jurisdiction under 28 U.C.C. 1337 by Quantreil Laura. (Burgos, Sandra)
October 23, 2023 Filing 7 Notice of Concerns - MOTION for Extension of Time by Quantreil Laura.(Burgos, Sandra)
October 4, 2023 Filing 6 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 10/23/2023. "Plaintiff shall show cause by October 23, 2023 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This Court has an independent obligation to inquire sua sponte into its own subject matter jurisdiction, see McCulloch v. Velez, 364 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2004), and '[i]f the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action,' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Although the plaintiff recites that this action is based upon a federal question, Compl. para. II(6), the Court discerns no federal question plausibly pleaded on the face of the complaint. Additionally, although the plaintiff does not assert diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332, it does not appear that the parties are diverse under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Accordingly, the Court lacks jurisdiction over this action, and it is subject to dismissal. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action. Summonses shall not issue absent further order of the Court.(PSSA, 5)
September 14, 2023 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Re-Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Barrows, Jennifer)
September 14, 2023 Filing 4 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. (Barrows, Jennifer)
September 5, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Quantreil Laura.(Burgos, Sandra) Modified docket text on 9/14/2023 (Burgos, Sandra).
September 5, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Burgos, Sandra)
September 5, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matthew Lazowski, filed by Quantreil Laura. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summons)(Burgos, Sandra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laura v. Lazowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quantreil Laura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Lazowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?