Alexanderowics v. Mapfre U.S.A. CORP et al
Lynne Alexanderowics |
MAPFRE U.S.A. CORP doing business as MAPFRE Insurance, The Commerce Insurance Company and Mapfre U.S.A Corp doing business as MAPFRE Insurance |
4:2023cv40125 |
September 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Indira Talwani |
Other Statutory Actions |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. ORDER CONSOLIDATING RELATED ACTIONS. Please see attached. All further pleadings are to be made on the docket of the Lead Case, In re MAPFRE Data Disclosure Litigation, 1:23-cv-12059-IT. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-12059-IT et al. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 9 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER allowing #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Amanda M. Rolon. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Amanda M. Rolon Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10070405 by Lynne Alexanderowics. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order)(Guglielmo, Joseph) |
Filing 7 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER allowing #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Gary F. Lynch. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed The Commerce Insurance Company served on 9/26/2023, answer due 10/17/2023. (Guglielmo, Joseph) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Mapfre U.S.A Corp served on 9/26/2023, answer due 10/17/2023. (Guglielmo, Joseph) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Gary F. Lynch Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10064210 by Lynne Alexanderowics. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order)(Guglielmo, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Burgos, Sandra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Commerce Insurance Company, MAPFRE U.S.A. CORP Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-10048916 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Lynne Alexanderowics. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form Category Form, #3 Request for Summons)(Guglielmo, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.