Porter Jr. v. McDermott Revokeable Trust et al
| Richard W Porter Jr. |
| McDermott Revokeable Trust, James McDermott and Herbert A Harrison |
| 4:2023cv40135 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| David H Hennessy |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.1. The Clerk of Court is directed to consolidate C.A. No. 23-40135-TSH with C.A. No. 23-40123-TSH. C.A. No. 23-40135-TSH shall be terminated on the Courts docket. The Lead Case shall be C.A. No. 23-40123-TSH, and all further pleadings shall be filed under this case number.2. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed in this matter, he must (1) either pay the $402 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and (2) file an amended complaint that sets forth both a basis for this Courts jurisdiction and a plausible claim upon which relief may be granted. Failure to comply with this directive within thirty-five days of the date of this Order (that is, by November 16, 2023) will result in dismissal of this action.3. All further papers filed or submitted for filing, including any motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and amended complaint, will be docketed in the lead action under case number 23-40123-TSH. The Clerk shall provide plaintiff a blank Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs.(Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 5 Copy re 4 Notice of Reassignment, 3 Order,, mailed to Richard W. Porter, Jr. on 10/10/2023. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman added. Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy no longer assigned to case. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE ENTERED. Because civil cases that are related under Local Rule 40.1(g) are to be assigned to the same judicial officer, and a related case that has not been treated as such at the time of filing may be transferred to the judge to whom it should be assigned, pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(i)(1), the Court orders that this action be reassigned to Judge Timothy S. Hillman as related to Porter v. Town of Londonderry, et al., 23-40123-TSH.(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Barrows, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Richard w Porter Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit)(Barrows, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
