Porter v. Malden District Court et al
Richard Porter |
Malden District Court, Wakefield Police Department, Kathleen Wenzel and Worcester Recovery Center Hospital |
4:2024cv40048 |
March 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Margaret R Guzman |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Copy re 11 Electronic Order mailed to Richard Porter on 5/9/2024. (Barrows, Jennifer) |
Filing 11 District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Mr. Porter shall not file any further documents in this action. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions. If the Clerk accepts documents submitted in violation of this order, said documents shall not be docketed as motions (even if Mr. Porter designates them as such), and the Court will not take any action on them. At the Clerks discretion, the Clerk may return to Mr. Porter documents submitted in violation of this order. Nonetheless, nothing in this order precludes Mr. Porter from filing a notice of appeal, or a motion to appeal in forma pauperis. (Barrows, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 Copy mailed E-Order 3 and 4 to: Richard W. Porter Jr 309 Belmont St Worcester, MA 01604 on (Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 9 Copy mailed E-Order #7 and 8 to: Richard Porter 309 Belmont Street Worcester, MA 01604 on 5-9-24. (Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 8 Copy re #6 Order,,,, #7 Order Dismissing Case mailed to Richard Porter on 5/9/2024. (Barrows, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASEAssociated Cases: 4:24-cv-40048-MRG, 4:24-cv-40068-MRG(PSSA, 3) |
Filing 6 District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: ORDER entered.1. This action is DISMISSED. 2. All pending motions shall be terminated as moot. 3. Porter shall not file any further documents in these actions, with the exception of a response to the Courts show cause directive, a notice of appeal, or a motion to appeal in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions. If the Clerk accepts documents submitted in violation of this order, said documents shall not be docketed as motions (even if Porter designates them as such), and the Court will not take any action on them. At his discretion, the Clerk may return to Porter documents submitted in violation of this order. 4. The Court directs Porter to show good cause in writing why he should not be enjoined from commencing new actions on the civil docket of this Court without first receiving permission to do so. Failure to follow this directive within twenty-eight (28) days will result in imposition of said order of enjoinment. Associated Cases: 4:24-cv-40048-MRG, 4:24-cv-40068-MRG(PSSA, 3) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Order by Richard Porter.(Burgos, Sandra) |
Filing 4 DOCKET SHEET sent to Richard Porter 309 Belmont Street Worcester, MA 01604 (Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Margaret R. Guzman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Barrows, Jennifer) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Richard Porter.(Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Richard Porter. (Attachments: #1 cover letter)(Castilla, Francis) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2024: #2 Exhibit in support) (Castilla, Francis). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.