Sullivan v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.
| Patrick Sullivan |
| Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. |
| 4:2026cv10921 |
| February 19, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Margaret R Guzman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: Scheduling Conference held on 6/17/2026. Case is called. Counsel and Pro Se Plaintiff appear for scheduling conference. The Court adopts the Joint Proposed Scheduling Order [ECF No. 20] subject to the following modification: Requests for Production of Documents, Interrogatories, and Requests for Admissions shall be served no later than October 30, 2026.Amended Pleadings due by 7/31/2026. Fact Discovery to be completed by 11/30/2026. Dispositive Motions due by 1/29/2027. Status Conference set for 12/16/2026 at 10:30 AM in a Remote Proceeding: Worcester before District Judge Margaret R. Guzman. (Court Reporter: Jessica Leonard at [email protected]) (Attorneys present: Newburger, Pro Se Plaintiff) (SF) |
| Filing 20 JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference . (Newburger, Manuel) |
| Filing 19 District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion for leave to electronically file Pro Se by Patrick Sullivan. Pro se litigants must have an individual PACER account to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts and must register to E-file. To register for a PACER account, go the PACER website at #https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.To register to E-file, follow the instructions on our website at #https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-se.htm.If the Massachusetts District Court is not in the dropdown list of courts, please email [email protected] with the docket number so your account can be updated allowing you to E-file. (SF) |
| Filing 18 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before District Judge Margaret R. Guzman: Scheduling Conference held on 6/2/2026. Case is called. Counsel and Pro Se Plaintiff appear for scheduling conference. Parties have not filed a proposed joint scheduling order. Court orders the parties to confer and file a joint proposed order before 6/17/2026. Scheduling Conference reset to 6/17/2026 at 2:30 PM in Remote Proceeding: Worcester before District Judge Margaret R. Guzman. (Court Reporter: Jessica Leonard at [email protected]) (Attorneys present: Newburger, Pro Se Plaintiff) (SF) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 6/2/2026 at 2:30 PM in Remote Proceeding: Worcester before District Judge Margaret R. Guzman. This hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the courtroom deputy of the session as soon as possible.Audio access to the hearing may be available to the media and public. Please check the #Court schedule. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html.For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the general orders and public notices of the Court available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact the session #here. Scheduling Conference set for 6/2/2026 02:30 PM in Remote Proceeding : Worcester before District Judge Margaret R. Guzman. (SF) |
| Filing 16 REPLY to Response to #11 MOTION for Leave to file electronically Pro Se filed by Patrick Sullivan. (SB) |
| Filing 15 Opposition re #11 MOTION for Leave to file electronically Pro Se filed by Patrick Sullivan. (Newburger, Manuel) |
| Filing 14 STATE COURT Record. (Newburger, Manuel) |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Reassignment. District Judge Margaret R. Guzman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (SB) |
| Filing 12 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge.. (SB) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to file electronically Pro Se by Patrick Sullivan.(SB) |
| Filing 10 Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal, by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.. (Newburger, Manuel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are required to submit a form indicating whether the parties consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. PROMPT SUBMISSION OF THE COMPLETED FORM IS MANDATORY. The parties are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 26-01, until the Court receives for filing a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, or until a case is reassigned to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for decision on all pretrial non-dispositive matters and for Report and Recommendation on dispositive matters. (JB) |
| Filing 8 FILED IN ERROR |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Local Category Form. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents - Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet.(JB) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 2/19/26 Case Number 1:26-cv-10921. (JB) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred to Central Division (Worcester) (FGD) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P..(Newburger, Manuel) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.. (Newburger, Manuel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Manuel H. Newburger on behalf of Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. (Newburger, Manuel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. ( Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-11559586 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - state Court Docket, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - State Court Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Newburger, Manuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sullivan v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patrick Sullivan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. | |
| Represented By: | Manuel H. Newburger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
