Olson v. Sherburne County et al
| Jay Paul Olson |
| Troy Halvorson, Jeremy Coolidge, Angela Knutson, John Doe, Brian Frank, Sherburne County and John Olson |
| 0:2007cv04757 |
| December 4, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Mille Lacs |
| Joan N. Ericksen |
| Raymond L. Erickson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.The Clinic Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 112] is GRANTED as to Herrmann, Nesser, and Schoen.2.Plaintiffs claims against Herrmann, Nesser, and Schoen are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.3.The Clinic Defendant s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 112] is DENIED as to Welsh and Lindberg-Maingi.4.The Countys Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 133] is GRANTED.5.Plaintiffs claims against the County are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on November 3, 2009. (slf)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER granting 65 Motion for Summary Judgment.Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Halvorson, Knutson, Frank, John Olson, and Coolidge are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Sherburne County based on the conduct of Halvorson, Knutson, Frank, John Olson, and Coolidge are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on June 22, 2009. (slf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
