Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Rodriguez v. Sherburne County Jail
as 0:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon v. Sherburne County Sheriff et al
as 0:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Brandon, III
Defendant:
Sherburne County Sheriff, Joel Brott and Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Sherburne County Jail
as 0:2023cv03663
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kruse v. City of Elk River, The et al
as 0:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Ann Kruse
Defendant:
City of Elk River, The, Elk River Police Department, David Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khalil Dodd v. John Doe, et al
as 23-2683
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Khalil Demar Dodd
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, Jane Doe, City of Sherburne and others
Hanes v. Sherburne County Jail et al
as 0:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cameron Hanes
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail, MenD Inc., Joel Brott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roybal v. Candor et al
as 0:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Christine M. Roybal
Defendant:
Lindsey Candor, Ashley Goebel and Sherburne County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maloney v. MEnD Correctional Care et al
as 0:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Maloney, Jr
Defendant:
MEnD Correctional Care, Sherburne County Jail, U.S. Marshall Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McClendon v. United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv03006
Petitioner:
Douglas McClendon
Respondent:
United States of America, US Marshall, Joel Broth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
