Kelly v. Ramsey County Sheriffs Office et al
| Thomas John Kelly |
| Ramsey County Sheriffs Office, Frerich, John Doe, St. Paul Police Department, Distell, Doe and Rob |
| 0:2008cv05028 |
| August 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Ramsey |
| Keyes |
| Rosenbaum |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER ADOPTING 48 Report and Recommendation; denying 41 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Thomas John Kelly. Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on 5/8/2009. (HLW)
|
|
Filing
48
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 41 MOTION for Default Judgment filed by Thomas John Kelly be denied. Objections to R&R due by 4/30/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 4/16/09. (kt)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING 32 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss filed St. Paul Police Department Defendants and 8 Motion to Dismiss filed by Ramsey County Defendants. Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on 2/27/2009. (HLW)
|
|
Filing
32
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION the motions 8 15 of the Ramsey County Defendants and the St. Paul Police Department Defendants to dismiss the complaint be granted in part and denied in part. Objections to R&R due by 2/10/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 1/23/09. (VEM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
