Cases 1 - 10 of 4,538
Smith v. Jeffreys et al
as 8:2025cv00389
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Smith
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Steve Fannon and Dawn Sheaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chino Valley Unified School District, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 25-3686
Plaintiff:
CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, OSCAR AVILA, MONICA BOTTS and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, ROB BONTA and TONY THURMOND
Brown v. Jeffreys
as 8:2025cv00383
Plaintiff:
Marvin Brown
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera Guzman et al v. Newscomb et al
as 3:2025cv01495
Plaintiff:
Glyndon Rivera Guzman, Daishi Rivera, Mutshito Rivera and others
Defendant:
Newscomb, Jeffrey McComber, County of Riverside and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Hill et al
as 1:2025cv00688
Plaintiff:
Catheryn D Fields
Defendant:
Jeff Hill, Harold Collins, John Hernderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wagner v. Hardy et al
as 3:2025cv50253
Plaintiff:
Terry Wagner
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Marzano, Samantha Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashlynn Marketing v. Pan et al
as 3:2025cv01430
Plaintiff:
Ashlynn Marketing doing business as Krave
Defendant:
Erica Pan and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cm Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
California Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta, et al.
as 25-3534
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Intervenor:
COUNCIL FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ON TOXICS
Wappler v. Feltner et al
as 6:2025cv00979
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Wappler
Defendant:
Rob Feltner, County Commissioners Brevard County, Wayne Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-1621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
