Cases 1 - 10 of 248
O'Toole v. Danaher et al
as 4:2024cv03067
Plaintiff:
Ryan James O'Toole
Defendant:
Dan Danaher, Teena Lenger, Michele Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Jeffereys
as 8:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Benjamin Hernandez
Respondent:
Rob Jeffereys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Costello v. Nebraska Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Costello
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Corrections, Erica Adeyemi, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berens & Miller, PA et al v. Apex Funding Source LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Berens & Miller, PA and Barbara Berens
Defendant:
Apex Funding Source LLC, Rob Eisenberg and Jane and John Doe Investors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Kirk Robinson v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-1392
Petitioner:
Kirk D. Robinson
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of RTC and Rob Jeffreys, Director of Corrections, Nebraska
Franke v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Pernell M. Franke
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tayvin Galanakis v. City of Newton, Iowa, et al
as 24-1275
Plaintiff:
Tayvin Galanakis
Defendant:
City of Newton, Iowa, Rob Burdess, Nathan Winters and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
