Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thompson et al v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson and Cattail Creek Subdivision-Phase II
Defendant:
State of Montana, City of Bozeman, Cattail Creek Community Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Banschbach v. Miller et al
as 6:2019cv00041
Defendant:
Joel Scheet, John Molendyke, Patrick Sheehan and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Banschbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2018cv00075
Defendant:
Cattail Creek Community Association(s) of Phase I, II and III & of the Combined Covenant Association, Daniel S. Madison, Amanda Menasco and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barker et al
as 9:2018cv00179
Petitioner:
Paul Kenny, Chuck Fyfe, Travis Hill and others
Respondent:
Selway Corportaion Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Selway Corporation
Intervenor:
Max Downing
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Donnelly et al v. Kellenbeck et al
as 9:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Ann Donnelly and Nathan Todd
Defendant:
Frank Kellenbeck, Rob Kellenbeck, Jesse Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LaBair et al v. Evergreen Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 9:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
Rob LaBair and Holly LaBair
Defendant:
Evergreen Recreational Vehicles, LLC and Blue Dog RV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shipley v. Homme
as 1:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rob Shipley
Defendant:
Al Homme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Shipley v. Buffett et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Rob Shipley
Defendant:
Warren Buffett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Shipley v. Whalen
as 1:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Rob Shipley
Defendant:
Joe Whalen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
