Clark v. Social Security Administration et al
| Martha Ruth Clark |
| Social Security Administration and Michael J. Astrue |
| 0:2009cv00496 |
| March 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Ericksen |
| Keyes |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss; adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 16 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on November 23, 2009. (SP)
|
|
Filing
16
AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that: 1. Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8), be DENIED; and 2. The following briefing schedule be ordered: a. Within 20 days of the date this Report and Recommendation is adopted by the District Court, Defend ants shall file and serve an answer; b. Within 60 days of the filing and service of the answer, Plaintiff shall file and serve on Defendants a motion for summary judgment and a memorandum of law in support. c. Within 45 days from the date of service of Plaintiffs motion, Defendants shall file and serve on Plaintiff a motion for summary judgment and a memorandum of law in support. d. Plaintiff may submit a reply memorandum, which shall be filed and served within 10 days from date of service of Defendants motion. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 10/23/09. (jam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
