Dornbusch v. Astrue

Dornbusch v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Kari A. Dornbusch
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	0:2009cv01734
Filed:	July 7, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Dakota
Presiding Judge:	Graham
Presiding Judge:	Schiltz
Nature of Suit:	Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 1, 2011	Filing 43 ORDER - Based on the foregoing and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court OVERRULES IN PART and SUSTAINS IN PART the objection of defendant Michael J. Astrue 40 and ADOPTS Judge Graham's Report and Recommendation 39 to the extent that it is consistent with this order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff Kari A. Dornbusch's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the EAJA 31 is GRANTED; Plaintiff Kari A. Dornbusch is awarded a total of & #036;6,434.25 in reasonable attorney's fees and $350.00 in costs, subject to offset by any preexisting debt that Dornbusch owes to the United States; Defendant Michael J. Astrue is directed to pay the above-awarded fees and costs, minus any applicable offset, by May 2, 2011; andPursuant to the "Assignment of EAJA Fee" signed by plaintiff Kari A. Dornbusch and filed with this Court on October 28, 2010 34 , defendant Michael J. Astrue is directed to pay the above-awarded fees and costs, minus any applicable offset, directly to Neut L. Strandemo. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 03/01/11. (bjs)
September 27, 2010	Filing 29 ORDER - Based on the foregoing and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court SUSTAINS Dornbusch's objection 20 and ADOPTS IN PART Judge Graham's Report and Recommendation 18 to the extent that it is consistent with this order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motion for summary judgment of defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration 10 is DENIED. The motion for summary judgment of plaintiff Kari A. Dornbusch [ 8] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: The decision of Administrative Law Judge Mary M. Kunz dated October 23, 2007 is REVERSED. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. (Written Opinion). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 09/27/10. (bjs)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 1, 2011

Filing 43 ORDER - Based on the foregoing and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court OVERRULES IN PART and SUSTAINS IN PART the objection of defendant Michael J. Astrue 40 and ADOPTS Judge Graham's Report and Recommendation 39 to the extent that it is consistent with this order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff Kari A. Dornbusch's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the EAJA 31 is GRANTED; Plaintiff Kari A. Dornbusch is awarded a total of & #036;6,434.25 in reasonable attorney's fees and $350.00 in costs, subject to offset by any preexisting debt that Dornbusch owes to the United States; Defendant Michael J. Astrue is directed to pay the above-awarded fees and costs, minus any applicable offset, by May 2, 2011; andPursuant to the "Assignment of EAJA Fee" signed by plaintiff Kari A. Dornbusch and filed with this Court on October 28, 2010 34 , defendant Michael J. Astrue is directed to pay the above-awarded fees and costs, minus any applicable offset, directly to Neut L. Strandemo. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 03/01/11. (bjs)

September 27, 2010

Filing 29 ORDER - Based on the foregoing and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court SUSTAINS Dornbusch's objection 20 and ADOPTS IN PART Judge Graham's Report and Recommendation 18 to the extent that it is consistent with this order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motion for summary judgment of defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration 10 is DENIED. The motion for summary judgment of plaintiff Kari A. Dornbusch [ 8] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: The decision of Administrative Law Judge Mary M. Kunz dated October 23, 2007 is REVERSED. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. (Written Opinion). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 09/27/10. (bjs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dornbusch v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	Lonnie F Bryan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kari A. Dornbusch
Represented By:	Neut L Strandemo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?