SUGGS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
FLOYD SUGGS |
OLSON, WEISINGES, BAKER, JOHN DOE, JOHANSSON, ANDERSON and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
0:2009cv03280 |
November 19, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Davis |
Graham |
Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 36 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Defendant John Johanssons motion for summary judgment, (Docket No. 29), isGRANTED; and This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/26/12. (KMW) |
Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion)Plaintiff is allowed to continue to prosecute his Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Johansson, without prejudice to any defenses that Defendant Johan sson might seek to raise hereafter. All of Plaintiff's other claims, aside from his Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Johansson, are summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A(b). All Defendants other than Defendant Johansson are dismissedfrom this action. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/10/11. (KMW) |
Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 16 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by FLOYD SUGGS (Written Opinion.. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/8/10. (KMW) |
Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 6 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/26/10. (KMW) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 4 , be DENIED; andb2. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 2/17/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham on 2/2/10. (VEM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.