Armstrong v. Target Corporation et al
| Anthony Armstrong |
| Target Corporation, Minneapolis Police Department and Stoll |
| 0:2010cv01340 |
| April 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Richard H. Kyle |
| Franklin L. Noel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 60 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 10/13/11. (kll) cc: Anthony Armstrong. (RLR)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER that Plaintiff Armstrong may, if he desires, submit an additional memorandum in response to Targets Motion for Summary Judgment; such response shall be served and filed on or before October 5, 2011; there will be no reply to such memorandum by Target unless so directed by the Court. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 09/23/11. (kll)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER 38 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 57 "Word Count Permission" Request has been granted. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 04/12/11. (kll)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss; Count V of the Complaint and all claims against Minneapolis are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; the Order to Show Cause (Doc. No. 28) is DISCHARGED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 11/151/0. (kll)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
