Laveau v. Astrue et al
Plaintiff: Lawrence John Laveau
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 0:2011cv00505
Filed: March 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Carlton
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 6] is DENIED; and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 3/22/12. (LPH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laveau v. Astrue et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence John Laveau
Represented By: Sean M Quinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Lonnie F Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?