InCompass IT, Inc. v. Dell Inc.

InCompass IT, Inc. v. Dell Inc.

Plaintiff:	InCompass IT, Inc.
Defendant:	Dell, Inc.
Case Number:	0:2011cv00629
Filed:	March 11, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Ramsey
Presiding Judge:	Jeanne J. Graham
Presiding Judge:	Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 6, 2012	Filing 52 ORDER - Defendant's partial motion 35 to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint 33 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's motion is GRANTED to the following extent: Count I (breach of non-disclosure agreement) and Cou nt II (misappropriation of trade secrets) insofar as those claims pertain to plaintiffs energy-saving technology are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Count V (Lanham Act) and Count VI (Minnesota Deceptive Trade Practices Act) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS. Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects. No further amendments to plaintiff's complaint will be permitted. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 02/06/12. (bjs)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 6, 2012

Filing 52 ORDER - Defendant's partial motion 35 to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint 33 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's motion is GRANTED to the following extent: Count I (breach of non-disclosure agreement) and Cou nt II (misappropriation of trade secrets) insofar as those claims pertain to plaintiffs energy-saving technology are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Count V (Lanham Act) and Count VI (Minnesota Deceptive Trade Practices Act) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS. Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects. No further amendments to plaintiff's complaint will be permitted. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 02/06/12. (bjs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: InCompass IT, Inc. v. Dell Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: InCompass IT, Inc.
Represented By:	Alfred M Stanbury
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dell, Inc.
Represented By:	Arthur G Boylan
Represented By:	Erica L Fenby
Represented By:	Michael P Kenny
Represented By:	Todd A Noteboom
Represented By:	Christopher A Riley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?