Ording v. Astrue

Ording v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Jeri Ording
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	0:2011cv02296
Filed:	August 10, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	St. Louis
Presiding Judge:	Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 15, 2013	Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 30 Report and Recommendation(Written Opinion). Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees 23 is GRANTED; Plaintiff is awarded a total of $4,879.00 in reasonable attorneys fees, subject to offse t by any preexisting debt that Plaintiff owes to the United States; and Pursuant to the assignment of the EAJA fee award signed by Plaintiff and filed with this Court 23 , the Commissioner is directed to pay the above-awarded fees, minus any applicable offset, directly to Lionel H. Peabody.Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/15/13. (KMW)
September 4, 2012	Filing 20 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated August 6, 2012 17 . 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 14 is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 8 is GRANTED in part as more fully described in the Report and Recommendation dated August 6, 2012. 4. The case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order and the Report and Recommendation dated August 6, 2012, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/4/12. (GRR)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 15, 2013

Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 30 Report and Recommendation(Written Opinion). Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees 23 is GRANTED; Plaintiff is awarded a total of $4,879.00 in reasonable attorneys fees, subject to offse t by any preexisting debt that Plaintiff owes to the United States; and Pursuant to the assignment of the EAJA fee award signed by Plaintiff and filed with this Court 23 , the Commissioner is directed to pay the above-awarded fees, minus any applicable offset, directly to Lionel H. Peabody.Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/15/13. (KMW)

September 4, 2012

Filing 20 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated August 6, 2012 17 . 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 14 is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 8 is GRANTED in part as more fully described in the Report and Recommendation dated August 6, 2012. 4. The case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order and the Report and Recommendation dated August 6, 2012, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/4/12. (GRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ording v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeri Ording
Represented By:	Lionel H Peabody
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?