Daniels v. Astrue et al
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Daniels, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:
0:2012cv00407
Filed:
February 16, 2012
Court:
Minnesota District Court
Office:
DMN Office
County:
Ramsey
Referring Judge:
Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge:
Paul A. Magnuson
Nature of Suit:
Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:
42:405
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
April 1, 2013 | 21 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Daniels v. Astrue et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kenneth Earl Daniels, Sr. | |
Represented By: | Stephen J Beseres |
Represented By: | Eddy Pierre Pierre |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.