Helsper v. Astrue et al

Plaintiff: Pamela L. Helsper
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 0:2012cv00708
Filed: March 21, 2012
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Referring Judge: Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 30, 2013 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 15] is DENIED; and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 17] is GRANTED (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 7/30/13. (LPH) cc: Pamela L. Helsper. Modified on 7/30/2013 (lmb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helsper v. Astrue et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela L. Helsper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: David W Fuller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?