Hayek v. Astrue et al
Plaintiff: Mary Beth Hayek
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 0:2012cv01986
Filed: August 14, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: Donovan W. Frank
Presiding Judge: Tony N. Leung
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is dismissed. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. See order for details. (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 9/27/13. (GMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayek v. Astrue et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Beth Hayek
Represented By: David L Christianson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: David W Fuller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?