Minnetonka Moccasin Company, Inc. v. Target Corporation et al
| Minnetonka Moccasin Company, Inc. |
| Target Corporation and E.S. Originals, Inc. |
| 0:2012cv02455 |
| September 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Hennepin |
| David S Doty |
| Jeffrey J Keyes |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Minnetonka Moccasin Company, Inc. (Podkopacz, Jerry) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Chief Mag. Judge Arthur J. Boylan recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 12cv2455 DSD/JJK. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Arthur J. Boylan on 9/26/2012. (JME)
|
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff Minnetonka Moccasin Company, Inc. (jz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E.S. Originals, Inc., Target Corporation ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 4067997.) assigned to Judge David S. Doty per Master/Trademark List referred to Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan, filed by Minnetonka Moccasin Company, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jz) |
| Summons Issued as to E.S. Originals, Inc., Target Corporation. (jz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
