Parker v. Chard et al
| Alexys Sherry Parker |
| Adam Chard, Robert Illetschko and Minneapolis, City of |
| 0:2012cv02574 |
| October 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Hennepin |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Tony N. Leung |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 19 ) is DENIED IN PART, and GRANTED IN PART as follows: a. With respect to Count I against the individual officer defendants, Defendants motion is DENIED; b. W ith respect to Counts III and IV against the individual officer defendants, Defendants' motion is GRANTED; c. With respect to Counts V and VI against the City of Minneapolis, Defendants' motion is GRANTED; and d. With respect to Count II a gainst the individual officer defendants and VII against all Defendants, the claims are DISMISSED AS MOOT;e. Therefore, Counts II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Plaintiffs partial motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 25 ) is DENIED IN PART, and GRANTED IN PART as follows: a. With respect to Count III against the individual officer defendants, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED; b. With respect to Count II against the individual officer defendants, this claim is DISMISSED AS MOOT; and c. With respect to Count I against the individual officer defendants, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/10/2014. (BJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
