Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Adam v. Doe et al
as 0:2023cv03615
Plaintiff:
Abdi Edan Adam
Defendant:
John Doe, John Does and Minneapolis, City of, the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Abdullahi v. Villegas et al
as 0:2023cv03600
Plaintiff:
Said Abdullahi
Defendant:
Sergio Villegas, Daniel Barlow, Minneapolis, City of, the and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crow v. Rasmussen et al
as 0:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Johnny James Crow
Defendant:
Eric Lee Rasmussen, Andrew Timothy Ruden and Minneapolis, City of, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Code v. Chauvin et al
as 0:2022cv01438
Plaintiff:
Zoya Code
Defendant:
Officer Derek Chauvin, Ross Blair and Minneapolis, City of, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Morgan et al
as 0:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
Keith Newman Alexander
Defendant:
James Morgan, Justin Young, John J Owen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKizzie v. Minneapolis, City of et al
as 0:2021cv02265
Plaintiff:
DAMAREION MCKIZZIE
Defendant:
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, WILLIAM GREGORY, Minneapolis, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv01825
Plaintiff:
Steven Allen Nelson, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Minneapolis City Council Members and Minnesota Department of Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Vert et al
as 0:2020cv02233
Defendant:
Officer Mohammad, Officer Weiss, Officer Vert and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stevenson v. Doe et al
as 0:2020cv02007
Defendant:
John Doe, Medaria Arradondo, Minneapolis, City of, the and others
Plaintiff:
Soren Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Doe et al
as 0:2020cv01913
Defendant:
John Does, Medaria Arradondo, Minneapolis, City of, the and others
Plaintiff:
Ethan Daniel Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
