Smith v. United States of America et al
| John Smith |
| Pete Bennett, Scott Fisher, Thomas Mayer, Paul Harvey, Barbara Mock, United States of America and Harrell Watts |
| 0:2013cv03277 |
| December 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Leo I. Brisbois |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 60 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Paul Harvey, Pete Bennett, Barbara Mock, Scott Fisher, United States of America, Harrell Watts, 72 Motion to Dismiss/General, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Thomas Mayer (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on January 21, 2015. (HAZ) (cc: John Smith)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1) Adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 20 Report and Recommendation. The recommendation section is adopted. The report section is adopted in part and rejected in part as stat ed in the Order. Plaintiff's 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied.2) Plaintiff's 46 objections to the 11 Order of the Magistrate Judge dated January 31, 2014 are overruled. The 11 Order of the Magistrate Judge dated January 31, 2014 is affirmed. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on August 8, 2014. (DML) Modi(cc: John Smith)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
