Jelde v. Dooley et al
Sara Jelde |
Sharon V. Dooley, Janet Napolitano and Molla Jelde Edati |
0:2013cv03610 |
December 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Ramsey |
Jeanne J. Graham |
Patrick J. Schiltz |
Other Immigration Actions |
46 U.S.C. ยง 1156 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion to dismiss of defendant Molla Jelde Edati 31 is GRANTED. Jelde's second amended complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Edati. 2. The motion for partial dismissal and remand of defe ndants Sharon V. Dooley and Janet Napolitano 34 is GRANTED. a. The decision as to whether to grant or deny Jelde's application for naturalization is REMANDED to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS"). USCIS must make an initial decision as to Jelde's application for naturalization no later than August 4, 2014. b. The remainder of Jelde's second amended complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Dooley and Napolitano. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on June 20, 2014. (CLG) |
Filing 14 ORDER - Jelde is ordered to show cause by Friday, January 24, 2014 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Failure to file a memorandum by that date will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 01/17/14. (BJS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.