Oberg v. Target Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Marites Reyes Oberg
Defendant: Target Corporation and Target Apple Valley
Case Number: 0:2019cv01481
Filed: June 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Michael J Davis
Referring Judge: Becky R Thorson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2019 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Marites Reyes Oberg. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(MMP)
July 29, 2019 Filing 8 LETTER REFERRING Litigant to FBA Pro Se Project from Magistrate Judge Thorson. (MSK) cc:Marites Reyes Oberg. Modified text on 7/30/2019 (MMG).
July 29, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Target Corporation. Target Corporation waiver sent on 7/1/2019, answer due 8/30/2019. (Orozco, Pablo)
July 1, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF LAWSUIT AND REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service for Defendants Target Corporation and Target Apple Valley. Documents have been mailed to all listed defendants: Order Granting IFP, Complaint, two Waiver of Services (AO 399), and one Prepaid Envelope. Waiver of Service due by 7/31/2019. (MTP)
June 18, 2019 Filing 5 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Order Granting IFP and USM Forms to Complete cc: Marites Reyes Oberg. (MMG)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 6/17/2019. (MSK) cc:Marites Reyes Oberg. Modified text on 6/18/2019 (MMG).
June 6, 2019 Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT DUE TO CASE ASSIGNMENT ERROR. This case is reassigned to Judge Michael J. Davis and Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson per 3rd/4th Civil Rights List. NOTE: the new case number is 19-cv-1481 MJD/BRT. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. (kt)cc: Oberg. (kt)
June 5, 2019 Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Marites Reyes Oberg. (LPH)
June 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Target Apple Valley, Target Corporation filed by Marites Reyes Oberg. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Civil Rts/ADA list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope) (LPH) cc: Oberg

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oberg v. Target Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Apple Valley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marites Reyes Oberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?