Puchalski v. McLellan et al
| Jacob Hugo Puchalski |
| Richard R. Hermes, D.O.C., Wright County Employees, Judge Kathleen A. Mottl, Jacob D. McLellan, Ryan Busch and Elizabeth M. Larson |
| 0:2020cv00973 |
| April 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jacob Hugo Puchalski re #4 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Jacob Hugo Puchalski, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 MOTION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (NAH) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Support re #3 MOTION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jacob Hugo Puchalski.(NAH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jacob Hugo Puchalski. (NAH) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Jacob Hugo Puchalski. (Attachments: #1 Attachment: Change to Employment)(NAH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jacob Hugo Puchalski. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Attachments: #1 Additional Facts, #2 Exhibit(s) Notice of Violation, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope) (NAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
