Bliven et al v. 3M company et al
Jeremy Smith, Shawn Thackrah, Larry Moreno, Mark Bliven, Anthony Boykins, Jose Moran, Ector Saldias, William Brickhouse, Vincent Bruccheri, Usbaldo Munoz, Virgil Harris, Charles Johnson, Brett Burrows, William Khazaal, Robert Green, Cade Dixon, Higinio Casiano, Starlin Rogers, Michael Mansisidor, Kyle Kennedy, Jose Gonzales, Travis Brookshire, Dallas Wicker, Michael Carlisle, Justin Wilcox, Robert Johnson, Christopher Passmore, Charles Nazarene, Dwayne Burrow, Vicente Griego, Thomas Hues, Jessica Bowden, Robert Tidwell, Henry Fernandez, Stephen Crane, Tyler Stricker, Juan Luciow, Nicholas Miller, Manuel Vargas, Matthew Hill, Bobby Fulton, Craig Callaway, Jerome Lauzon, Dennis Chilcote, Luis Maciel and Felicia Ramirez |
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC |
0:2021cv00908 |
April 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Katherine M Menendez |
John R Tunheim |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 USCA Case Number 21-2770 for #19 Notice of Appeal to 8th Circuit filed by 3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC. (MTP) |
Filing 20 TRANSMITTAL OF APPEAL LETTER TO U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, 8TH CIRCUIT, Re: Notice of Appeal to 8th Circuit #19 . (kt) |
Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO 8TH CIRCUIT as to #16 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court by 3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number AMNDC-8937369. (Hulse, Benjamin) |
Filing 18 LETTER from Clerk's Office to Hennepin County District Court enclosing #16 Order of Remand. cc: Hennepin County District Court. (lmb) |
Filing 17 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(lmb) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Remand to State Court(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 7/29/2021. (HMA) |
Filing 15 (Text-Only) NOTICE TO ATTORNEY. The Court will rule on the Motion to Remand to State Court on the papers submitted. Written order forthcoming. (HMA) |
Filing 14 REPLY re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Mark Bliven, Jessica Bowden, Anthony Boykins, William Brickhouse, Travis Brookshire, Vincent Bruccheri, Dwayne Burrow, Brett Burrows, Craig Callaway, Michael Carlisle, Higinio Casiano, Dennis Chilcote, Stephen Crane, Cade Dixon, Henry Fernandez, Bobby Fulton, Jose Gonzales, Robert Green, Vicente Griego, Virgil Harris, Matthew Hill, Thomas Hues, Charles Johnson, Robert Johnson, Kyle Kennedy, William Khazaal, Jerome Lauzon, Juan Luciow, Luis Maciel, Michael Mansisidor, Nicholas Miller, Jose Moran, Larry Moreno, Usbaldo Munoz, Charles Nazarene, Christopher Passmore, Felicia Ramirez, Starlin Rogers, Ector Saldias, Jeremy Smith, Tyler Stricker, Shawn Thackrah, Robert Tidwell, Manuel Vargas, Dallas Wicker, Justin Wilcox. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Gustafson, Daniel) |
Filing 13 DECLARATION of Benjamin W. Hulse in Opposition to #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits A- M)(Hulse, Benjamin) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by 3M Company, Aearo Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Hulse, Benjamin) |
Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Mark Bliven.(Williams, Amanda) |
Filing 10 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #7 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Mark Bliven.(Williams, Amanda) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Mark Bliven. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Williams, Amanda) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court : Date and time to be determined. (Williams, Amanda) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by all plaintiffs. (Williams, Amanda) Modified text on 5/3/2021 (MKB). |
Filing 6 Defendants 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC's ANSWER to Complaint filed by 3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC. (Hulse, Benjamin) |
Filing 5 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Richard M. Paul III, Ashlea G. Schwarz as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MMP) |
Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per MDL list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 21-cv-908 (JRT/KMM). (MMP) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by 3M Company re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Hulse, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant 3M Company. (Hulse, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8655557) filed by 3M Company. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3Civil Cover Sheet) (Hulse, Benjamin) Modified text on 4/1/2021 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.