Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mark Bliven, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-2770
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mark Bliven, Jessica Bowden, Anthony Boykins and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Bliven et al v. 3M company et al
as 0:2021cv00908
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith, Shawn Thackrah, Larry Moreno and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
BISSESSAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
JEREMY SMITH, SHAWN THACKRAH, LARRY MORENO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bissessar et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02313
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith, Shawn Thackrah, Larry Moreno and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrell v. Brickhouse et al
as 1:2018cv01183
Plaintiff:
Chyvonne E. Harrell
Defendant:
William Brickhouse, Ph.D., MHM Correctional Services, Inc., Nekeya Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. Mann et al
as 1:2017cv02499
Plaintiff:
Chyvonne E. Harrell
Defendant:
Jeffrey Mann, William Brickhouse , Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mamie Cook-Benjamin v. MHM Correctional Services, Inc, et al
as 13-15960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAMIE COOK-BENJAMIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. and WILLIAM BRICKHOUSE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cook-Benjamin v. MHM Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04086
Plaintiff:
Mamie Cook-Benjamin
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, Inc. and William Brickhouse
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
