Grande v. U.S. Dept. of Human Services et al
Patrick Ryan Grande |
State of MN, MN DHS, U.S. Dept. of Human Services and U.S. Food and Drug Admin. |
0:2021cv01492 |
June 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Hildy Bowbeer |
Eric C Tostrud |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 6/28/2021. (LNP) |
Filing 3 NOTICE - Magistrate Judge Hildy's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from Local Rules. (LNP) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Patrick Ryan Grande. (NAH) Document QC'd on 7/21/2021 (MTP). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MN DHS, State of MN, U.S. Dept. of Human Services, U.S. Food and Drug Admin. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number 44641111148) filed by Patrick Ryan Grande. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (NAH) Modified text on 6/25/2021 (NAH). Document QC'd on 7/21/2021 (MTP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.