Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Spottswood v. State of MN Wash Co, The et al
as 0:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Shawn Clarke Spottswood
Defendant:
The State of MN Wash Co, Zoom and State of MN Wash Co, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grande v. State of MN et al
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Grande
Defendant:
State of MN, Saint Peter Regional Treatment Center and State of MN Dept. of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Axelson v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv03913
Plaintiff:
Rian A Axelson and Rian Alan Axelson
Defendant:
State of MN and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mosby et al v. State of MN
as 0:2023cv03604
Plaintiff:
Alexisus Jarmon Mosby and D. Elise Bergeron
Defendant:
State of MN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Centurion of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
Centurion of Minnesota, MN DOC, State of MN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Minnesota DOC et al
as 0:2023cv02969
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Defendant:
Minnesota DOC, State of MN, Joan Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. State of MN
as 0:2022cv00740
Petitioner:
Miyo M. Alexander
Respondent:
State of MN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of MN et al
as 0:2021cv01811
Petitioner:
Adairan Martell Davis
Respondent:
State of MN, Henn. Co., Kevin Beiging and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grande v. U.S. Dept. of Human Services et al
as 0:2021cv01492
Defendant:
State of MN, MN DHS, U.S. Dept. of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Grande
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. DOC State of MN, Minneasota
as 0:2020cv01376
Petitioner:
Harold Lacy
Defendant:
DOC State of MN, Minneasota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
