Kantaris v. Birkholz et al
| Robert Kantaris |
| B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal |
| 0:2021cv02020 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| John R Tunheim |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert Kantaris. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 10/13/2021.(JLB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann M Bildtsen on behalf of B. Birkholz, Michael Carvajal. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Bildtsen, Ann) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk's Office to Robert Kantaris re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Kantaris (NAH) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Robert Kantaris re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (NAH) Document QC'd on 9/29/2021 (MTP). |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Robert Kantaris by Robert Kantaris. (NAH) Document QC'd on 9/29/2021 (MTP). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert Kantaris. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per 5th/Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (NAH) Document QC'd on 9/29/2021 (MTP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
