Kurtenbach v. City of Shakopee et al
| Matthew Kurtenbach |
| City of Shakopee, Scott County, Joshua Davis, Adam Predovich, Nathan Olson, City of Faribault and Anthony Larson |
| 0:2021cv02379 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| David T Schultz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 12/20/2021. (NEM)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Matthew Kurtenbach. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(MTP) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/4/2021. (TJB)
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Matthew Kurtenbach. (NAH) Document QC'd on 12/3/2021 (MMG). |
| Filing 1 42 USC 1983 COMPLAINT against City of Faribault, City of Shakopee, Joshua Davis, Anthony Larson, Nathan Olson, Adam Predovich, Scott County filed by Matthew Kurtenbach. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (NAH) Document QC'd on 12/3/2021 (MMG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
