Brankle v. United States Probation Office et al
| David W. Brankle |
| United States Probation Office, Marc R. Grawe, Paul Ricketts, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and J. Fikes |
| 0:2021cv02528 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Becky R Thorson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal, #2 Appeal Packet)(lmb) |
Filing 8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 1/10/2022.(CLG)
|
| (Text-Only) Mail Returned as Undeliverable #6 . Mail sent to David W. Brankle at FCI Sandstone, P.O. Box 1000, Sandstone, MN 55072 was returned to sender, not at this address, released. Re-mailed docket entry #6 to Mr. Brankle at new address on docket sheet at 555 West 6th Street, Gerner, IA 50438.(MMP) Qc'd on 1/14/2022 (KNK). |
| (Text-Only) Mail Returned as Undeliverable #4 , #2 , #3 , #1 . Mail sent to David W. Brankle at FCI Sandstone, P.O. Box 1000, Sandstone, MN 55072 was returned to sender, not at this address, released. Re-mailed docket entries 1-4 to Mr. Brankle at new address on docket sheet at 555 West 6th Street, Gerner, IA 50438. (MMP) Document QC'd on 1/13/2022 (MMG). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad A Blumenfield on behalf of Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Fikes, Marc R. Grawe, Paul Ricketts, United States Probation Office(For the District of Wyoming; any and all unnamed subordinates of the above named parties in their official capacity, jointly and severally), United States Probation Office(For the Southern District of Ohio; any and all unnamed subordinates of the above named parties in their official capacity, jointly and severally). (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Blumenfield, Chad) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed by David W. Brankle; #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David W. Brankle. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 11/22/2021. (JRS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David W Fuller on behalf of Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Fikes, Marc R. Grawe, Paul Ricketts, United States Probation Office(For the District of Wyoming; any and all unnamed subordinates of the above named parties in their official capacity, jointly and severally), United States Probation Office(For the Southern District of Ohio; any and all unnamed subordinates of the above named parties in their official capacity, jointly and severally). (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Fuller, David) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David W. Brankle.(JGK) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of David W. Brankle by David W. Brankle. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(JGK) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by David W. Brankle. (JGK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by David W. Brankle. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 5th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Appendix, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Envelope) (JGK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
