Rodriguez v. D.O.C
| Rico Rodriguez |
| D.O.C, Warden Sharlinde Wheeler, Paul Schnell, Han. Larson, Food Services of O.P.H., Diana Michell, Head of H.R.U Hearing Officials and Head of Sex Treatment Programing |
| 0:2021cv02659 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| David T Schultz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 1/28/2022. (TJB)
|
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT re #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, #4 Letter to Magistrate Judge filed by Rico Rodriguez filed by Rico Rodriguez.(MMG) |
| Filing 4 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Rico Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MMG) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 1/5/2022.(NEM)
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Rico Rodriguez. (NAH) |
| Filing 1 42 USC 1983 COMPLAINT against D.O.C filed by Rico Rodriguez. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (NAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
