Baker v. Ivory et al
| Kelvin Lee Baker |
| Samantha Ivory, Melvin Mitchell, Dan Cortez, Tony, Albert, Davis and Cain |
| 0:2023cv03895 |
| December 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Jeffrey M Bryan |
| David T Schultz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Kelvin Lee Baker. (kt) Document QC'd on 2/22/2024 (ACH). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address by Kelvin Lee Baker. (kt) Document QC'd on 2/16/2024 (JME). |
| (Text-Only) #1 , #2 Mail Returned as Return to Sender/Insufficient Address/Unable to Forward. Mail sent to: Kelvin Lee Baker 1010 Curry Ave Minneapolis, MN 55403 No forwarding address available. Mail not re-sent. (LTT) Document QC'd on 1/26/2024 (JME). |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Kelvin Lee Baker. (JGK) Document QC'd on 1/16/2024 (JME). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Albert, Cain, Dan Cortez, Davis, Samantha Ivory, Melvin Mitchell, Tony filed by Kelvin Lee Baker. Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Addendum, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (JGK) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/28/2023: #3 Exhibit(s)) (JGK). Document QC'd on 1/16/2024 (JME). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
