Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hogue v. Wooten et al
as 4:2026cv00275
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hogue
Defendant:
Investigatord Joel Christian Wooten and Officer Tanner Caine Railey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barkley v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2026cv06612
Plaintiff:
Joshua S Barkley
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Greg Ruiz, Kenneth D McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mixon v. Cain
as 3:2026cv00746
Plaintiff:
Van Earl Mixon
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAINES v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv11754
Plaintiff:
JASON CAINES
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Huckfeldt v. Cain et al
as 4:2026cv00380
Plaintiff:
Brian Andrew Huckfeldt
Defendant:
Chales William Cain, Gary J. Keller, Bruce William Huckfeldt, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Chambers
as 2:2026cv02868
Plaintiff:
Cedric Cain
Defendant:
Sr. Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Huffman et al
as 1:2026cv00261
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jordan
Defendant:
Brand Huffman, John Hostetter and Nathan Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Cain et al
as 3:2026cv00733
Plaintiff:
Clifton Dean
Defendant:
Burl Cain, John Hunt, Mike Dixon and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkston v. Cain et al
as 3:2026cv00734
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Nathanial Burl Cain, John Hunt, Laura Reid and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
