Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Dopkins v. Beltz et al
as 0:2024cv03417
Respondent:
Minnesota and Tracy Beltz
Petitioner:
Bradford Cain Dopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dopkins v. Fridley Police Department et al
as 0:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Bradford Cain Dopkins
Defendant:
Anoka County Jail, Jeffrey A Guest, Kevin Titus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Baker v. Ivory et al
as 0:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Lee Baker
Defendant:
Samantha Ivory, Melvin Mitchell, Dan Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Beck et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Anjaletta Beck, Arnaldo Santiago, Robert Jerome Taylor and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 0:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. GreenLee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cain v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01154
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Cain
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
