Melander-Smith v. United States Postal Service et al
| Sheri Melander-Smith |
| USPS, Postmaster Doe, Tiffany Doe and United States Postal Service |
| 0:2024cv00111 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| John R Tunheim |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Ratkowski on behalf of Sheri Melander-Smith. (Ratkowski, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Sheri Melander-Smith re #3 Summons Issued (Applebaum, Paul) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Sheri Melander-Smith re #3 Summons Issued (Applebaum, Paul) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Postmaster Doe, Tiffany Doe, United States Postal Service. (MKB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights: Housing/Accommodations, ADA Other) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 24-cv-111 (JRT/TNL).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10778175) filed by Sheri Melander-Smith. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Applebaum, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
