Engel v MODOC et al
Joseph Michael Devon Engel |
Patterson, Freddie Tucker, Griffith, Minx, Pinkley, Probation & Parole, Cooper, C&A, Andrew, Emily & Mom, ERDCC, Cook, MODOC, Bova, Locke, Williams, Konig, Freeman, McFarland, Coklin, Bennett, Miller and Chad William |
4:2020cv01795 |
December 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Henry Edward Autrey |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Joseph Michael Devon Engel. (AAT) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Dec 18 16:01:04 CST 2020 (admin,) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (BAK) |
Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Henry E. Autrey. (BAK) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Joseph Michael Devon Engel. (BAK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Joseph Michael Devon Engel. (BAK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Joseph Michael Devon Engel.(BAK) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/18/2020: #1 Envelope) (BAK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.