Cases 1 - 10 of 100
HALL v. HAUSER et al
as 1:2026cv00184
Defendant:
KEVIN GRIFFITH, AUSTIN MYKYTKA and TAYLOR HAUSER
Plaintiff:
LEMOND HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffith v. Chubb Insurance Agency Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv01686
Plaintiff:
Janet Griffith
Defendant:
Chubb Insurance Agency Inc., Autoridad del Distrito de Convenciones de Puerto Rico, Insurers 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Woodward-Griffith v. NH, State of et al
as 1:2026cv00924
Plaintiff:
Brok-Alan Woodward-Griffith
Defendant:
NH, State of, NH Supreme Court, Gordon J. MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Story v. Azaiez
as 26-50932
Defendant:
Lauren Griffith, Detective Sergeant, Carla Amacher, Dennis Weiner, PD Chief and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Story
Nichols v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2026cv00564
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Sarah Sanders, Tim Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Samuel Griffith
as 26-3978
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SAMUEL AARON GRIFFITH
GRIFFITH v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv05197
Plaintiff:
KATIE GRIFFITH
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffiths et al v. Ernst & Young Medical Plan
as 4:2026cv09231
Plaintiff:
CALVIN GRIFFITHS and DAVID BROCK GRIFFITHS
Defendant:
ERNST & YOUNG MEDICAL PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
