Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Grooms v. Cox et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jordan Grooms, Sr.
Defendant:
Casey Cox, Tim Clafflin, John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Timothy Griffith
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anthony et al v. Van Over et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
William Anthony, PBA Martial Arts, Inc., Katie Baker and others
Defendant:
Barry Van Over, Myles Baker, Brent Seebohm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. Griffith
as 3:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
William Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Haget et al
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burger v. Polk County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jillian Burger
Defendant:
Polk County, Tennessee, Mark Von Roden, Stacy Weed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Griffith et al
as 3:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
William Griffith, Jane Marie Levie, David Alsobrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Griffith v. City of Germantown
as 2:2021cv02457
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk and Master W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Griffith
Defendant:
City of Germantown, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Scholl et al
as 2:2021cv02248
Defendant:
Michael Scholl, Martin Zummack, Jocelyn Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellous Cobb
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cobb v. Scholl et al
as 2:2021cv02247
Defendant:
Michael Scholl, Martin Zummack, Jocelyn Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellous Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
