Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Griffith v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Indira Griffith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases
Griffiths v. KeyBank National Association
as 3:2023cv00005
Defendant:
KeyBank National Association and New Haven Savings Bank
Plaintiff:
Gloria Griffiths
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Griffith v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Indira Griffith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Griffiths v. KeyBank, N.A.
as 3:2020cv00212
Defendant:
KeyBank, N.A. and New Haven Savings Bank
Plaintiff:
Gloria Griffiths
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruszkowski et al v. Stamford et al
as 3:2016cv01953
Defendant:
City of Stamford
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Ruszkowski, Jr. , Dana Renee Griffith and Jill Kathleen King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruszkowski, Jr. et al v. City of Stamford et al
as 5:2016cv01953
Defendant:
City of Stamford and Board of Trustees of the Classified Employees Retirement Fund of the City of Stamford
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Ruszkowski, Jr. , Dana Renee Griffith and Jill Kathleen King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Ebling
as 5:2015cv01409
Plaintiff:
Garvin Griffith
Defendant:
Jane Ebling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. Ebling
as 3:2015cv01409
Plaintiff:
Garvin M. Griffith
Defendant:
Jane Ebling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harnage v. Barrone et al
as 3:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
James A. Harnage
Defendant:
S. Barrone, Chapdelaine, Peter Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith Company, Inc. v. National Auditing Services & Consulting et al
as 3:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
Griffith Company, Inc.
Defendant:
National Auditing Services & Consulting and Does
Cause Of Action: Telecommunications Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
