Whitley et al v. Neal
Plaintiff: Gillian Ray Whitley, Jeffrey Francis Knifong and Jason Pipkin
Defendant: Mike Neal
Case Number: 2:2019cv04165
Filed: August 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Stephen R Bough
Referring Judge: Prisoner Pro Se
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is ordered to file an amended complaint as set forth herein on or before October 9, 2019, or his case will be dismissed without further notice; and (2) the Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff another set of civil rights forms for his use in filing an amended complaint. Signed on September 25, 2019 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (CLERK'S NOTE: Civil rights forms mailed to plaintiff with copy of order as directed.) (Davies, Cindy)
August 28, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of change of address filed by Gillian Ray Whitley. New address is 600 N Mulberry St., Lot 16, Fayette, MO 65248. (CLERK'S NOTE: Copy of Doc. 5 mailed to plaintiff to new address.) (Davies, Cindy)
August 26, 2019 Filing 6 LETTER to the Court filed by Jason Pipkin. (Davies, Cindy)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiff Whitley is GRANTED provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiffs Knifong and Pipkin are DISMISSED without prejudice; and (3) Plaintiff Whitley is ordered to provide an updated address on or before September 5, 2019, or this case will be DISMISSED without further notice. Signed on 08/22/2019 by District Judge Stephen R. Bough. (Willis, Kathy)
August 21, 2019 Filing 4 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Gillian Ray Whitley. (CLERK'S NOTE: Handwritten note enclosed with inmate account statement stating plaintiff was released from custody on 8/15/19.) (Davies, Cindy)
August 7, 2019 Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Gillian Ray Whitley. (Davies, Cindy)
August 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sheriff Mike Neal filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(Davies, Cindy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitley et al v. Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gillian Ray Whitley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Francis Knifong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Pipkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?