Cassidy v. Reger et al
| Allen Paul Cassidy |
| Davis, Reger, Brock Van Loo, Jane Doe 1, Thomas, Corizon Medical Services, Jane Doe 2, Gaby, Marriott, Barker and Stamps |
| 2:2021cv04100 |
| May 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Nanette K Laughrey |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. #3 ), is denied without prejudice; (2) Defendants Van Loo, Barker, and Thomas are severed and dismissed from this case; (3) the Clerk of the Court is directed to remove Defendants Van Loo, Barker, and Thomas from the docket sheet; (4) the agency having custody of Plaintiff forward to the Clerk of the Court monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $350 filing fee is paid ($348.30); (5) the Clerk of the Court is directed to provide all parties, in addition to this Order, the mediation request form; (6) the Attorney General of Missouri and Corizon shall notify the Court, in writing, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, for which Defendants they will and will not waive service of process; and (7) Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and 12, within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order if service of process is waived, or within twenty-one (21) days after service of process if service of process is not waived.Signed on 6/14/2021 by Senior District Judge Nanette K Laughrey. (CLERK'S NOTE: Mediation request form along with a copy of this Order provided to all parties as directed. Collect filing fee letter mailed to MO DOC Finance Office with copy of this Order as directed.) (Willis, Kathy)
|
| RECEIPT number KCMO090454 in the amount of $1.70 issued to Allen Paul Cassidy. (Woods, Gloria) Modified on 6/14/2021 to correct receipt number. (Woods, Gloria). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: ORDERED that, because Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee as previously ordered, Plaintiff shall show cause, on or before June 16, 2021, as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with this Court's Orders. Signed on 6/2/2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Willis, Kathy)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) Plaintiff shall pay to the clerk of the court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division, an initial partial filing fee of $1.70; and (3) Plaintiff's failure to pay the required initial partial filing fee on or before May 27, 2021, will result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Signed on May 13, 2021 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. (Davies, Cindy)
|
| Filing 5 Inmate ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/25/2021. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 2 IFP FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. (Davies, Cindy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Allen Paul Cassidy. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits)(Davies, Cindy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
