Ighalo v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Abe Ighalo
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2009cv00032
Filed: January 15, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Larsen
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying 32 motion to alter judgment; finding as moot 33 motion to strike. Signed on 4/22/10 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa)
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 25 motion for summary judgment Signed on 3/2/10 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ighalo v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abe Ighalo
Represented By: Larry D. Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: OGCSSAR7
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?